Task 1 的三個 band 差距最清楚——因為題目客觀,沒有「論點好不好」的模糊。本篇用一張折線圖,寫出 Band 6 / 7 / 8 三版,逐句標出為什麼每個 band 差 0.5 分

題目

The line graph below shows the number of international visitors arriving in Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore between 2000 and 2020 (in millions).

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Imagined data for reference:

| Year | Thailand | Malaysia | Singapore | |------|----------|----------|-----------| | 2000 | 10 | 11 | 8 | | 2005 | 13 | 16 | 9 | | 2010 | 16 | 25 | 12 | | 2015 | 30 | 26 | 15 | | 2019 | 40 | 26 | 19 | | 2020 | 7 | 4 | 3 |


Version A — Band 6(約 155 字)

The line graph shows the number of international visitors in Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore from 2000 to 2020.

In 2000, Malaysia had 11 million visitors and it was the highest. Thailand had 10 million and Singapore had 8 million. Then the numbers went up. In 2010, Malaysia had 25 million, Thailand had 16 million and Singapore had 12 million. After 2010, Thailand grew very fast and became the highest. In 2019, Thailand had 40 million visitors, Malaysia had 26 million and Singapore had 19 million.

But in 2020, the numbers went down a lot because of the pandemic. Thailand dropped to 7 million, Malaysia dropped to 4 million and Singapore dropped to 3 million.

So we can see that Thailand became the most popular country for tourists between 2000 and 2020, but all three countries had a big drop in 2020.


Version B — Band 7(約 170 字)

The line graph compares the number of international visitors, measured in millions, received by Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore over a twenty-year period from 2000 to 2020.

Overall, all three countries experienced sustained growth in tourist arrivals for most of the period, before suffering a sharp decline in the final year. Thailand emerged as the dominant destination, overtaking Malaysia around 2015.

In 2000, Malaysia led with 11 million visitors, slightly ahead of Thailand at 10 million and Singapore at 8 million. Over the next decade, Malaysia's growth was particularly rapid, reaching 25 million by 2010, while Thailand and Singapore climbed more gradually to 16 and 12 million respectively.

Between 2010 and 2019, however, the positions shifted markedly. Thailand surged from 16 to 40 million, eclipsing Malaysia, which plateaued at around 26 million. Singapore's figure rose steadily to 19 million. In 2020, all three countries saw dramatic falls, with arrivals collapsing to just 7, 4, and 3 million respectively.


Version C — Band 8(約 180 字)

The line graph depicts international tourist arrivals, expressed in millions, in Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore across the two decades from 2000 to 2020.

Overall, all three Southeast Asian nations experienced substantial growth in visitor numbers until 2019, but saw this progress virtually erased in 2020. The most striking development was Thailand's transformation from the second-smallest market in 2000 to a clear regional leader by the late 2010s.

In 2000, Malaysia marginally led the region with 11 million arrivals, narrowly outpacing Thailand's 10 million and Singapore's 8 million. Malaysia then enjoyed the steepest growth in the first decade, more than doubling to 25 million by 2010, while the other two rose only modestly.

The pattern inverted thereafter: Thailand's figures surged from 16 to 40 million between 2010 and 2019 — a near two-and-a-half-fold increase — while Malaysia's plateaued around 26 million and Singapore's climbed incrementally to 19 million. The pandemic year wiped out decades of growth across the board, with arrivals plunging to 7, 4, and 3 million respectively, returning all three markets below their 2000 baselines.


逐項對照(四個維度 + 一個關鍵扣分點)

1. Task Achievement

| Band | Overview 句 | 主要特徵是否抓到 | 典型證據 | |------|-------------|-------------------|----------| | 6 | 有,但很弱、放在結尾 | 抓到「Thailand 變成最高」跟「2020 下降」,但沒抓到Malaysia 早期領先的轉換 | "So we can see that Thailand became the most popular country..." — overview 應該在第二句,不是最後一句 | | 7 | 強、放第二段、抓兩個特徵 | 全部抓到 + 排序(overtaking Malaysia around 2015) | "Overall, all three countries experienced sustained growth ... Thailand emerged as the dominant destination, overtaking Malaysia around 2015." | | 8 | 強 + 有戲劇性描述 | 抓到「2000 年原本 Thailand 第二小」這個對比點 | "The most striking development was Thailand's transformation from the second-smallest market in 2000 to a clear regional leader by the late 2010s." |

2. 趨勢動詞與比較語言

| Band | 動詞 | 證據 | |------|------|------| | 6 | went up / dropped / grew / had — 只有 4 種 | "Thailand grew very fast"grew 只出現 | | 7 | experienced / suffered / climbed / surged / plateaued / eclipsing — 8+ 種 | "Thailand surged from 16 to 40 million, eclipsing Malaysia, which plateaued at around 26 million." | | 8 | virtually erased / inverted / plunging / returning below baseline — 精準且帶幅度感 | "The pandemic year wiped out decades of growth across the board, with arrivals plunging to 7, 4, and 3 million respectively..." |

3. Cohesion — 怎麼組織資料

| Band | 組織方式 | 評分結果 | |------|----------|----------| | 6 | 流水帳 — 照年份走(2000 → 2010 → 2019 → 2020) | 扣 Coherence 分;這是典型 B1 描述 | | 7 | 兩階段 — 前期 Malaysia 領先、後期 Thailand 超車 | Coherence 7 | | 8 | 三階段 + 轉折敘事 — 前期、翻轉、崩盤 | Coherence 8 |

4. Lexical Resource

| Band | 搭配 | 證據 | |------|------|------| | 6 | the numbers went up / dropped a lot / very fast — 口語 | "the numbers went down a lot because of the pandemic"a lot 太口語 | | 7 | sustained growth / sharp decline / marginally / plateaued at / eclipsing | "the positions shifted markedly" | | 8 | virtually erased / incrementally / near two-and-a-half-fold / returning below their 2000 baselines | "The pattern inverted thereafter" |

關鍵扣分:Band 6 自己解釋原因

"But in 2020, the numbers went down a lot because of the pandemic."

Task 1 不能加解釋。這句 because of the pandemic 是寫作者自己加的,圖上沒有。Band 7/8 的版本都避開這個——用 collapsed / plunged 描述現象但不解釋原因。這個錯誤直接把 Task Achievement 從 6.5 拉回 6.0。


Takeaway — Band 6 寫作者的三個高槓桿升級

升級 1:Overview 句一定放在第 2 段開頭

Band 6 最常把 overview 放最後或完全漏掉——劍橋官方規則:沒有 overview = 自動上限 5.5

固定套句:Overall, [特徵 1], [特徵 2].

練習:拿你寫過的 Task 1,找出 overview 句;若沒有,加一句;若在結尾,搬到 §1 或 §2。

升級 2:停用 "went up / went down / a lot"

把這些詞從你的 Task 1 刪光。替換表:

| Ban 6 | Band 7+ | |-------|---------| | went up | rose / climbed / surged | | went down | fell / dropped / plunged | | a lot | substantially / sharply / dramatically | | many / a lot of | a significant proportion / the majority |

升級 3:不要照年份排——按「組」排

Band 6 常寫:「2000 年 A=10, B=11, C=8;2010 年 A=16, B=25, C=12;2020 年…」——這是流水帳。

Band 7+ 寫:「前期 Malaysia 領先(§2),後期 Thailand 超車(§3),疫情全數崩盤(§4)」——這是歸納 + 對比

同樣的資料,組織方式決定 0.5 分。


下一篇:Task 1 General 正式信 — Band 6 vs 7 vs 8